fbpx

Insights-led messaging alienates customers when communicating price increases

by | May 18, 2017 | Marketing, Public Relations

Whether you call it “provoking” or “challenging,” the insights-led messaging approach that made big news in the Harvard Business Review and several subsequent books has become all the rage in the last few years. Surprisingly, though, it turns out that disrupting your customer during a renewal or price increase discussion is the exact wrong approach—one that could drive a good customer right into the arms of your competition.

That’s according to recent academic studies conducted by social psychology professors who put would-be customers into “buying simulations” and measured how they react. (This testing approach contrasts with the original research in support of the “provocative/challenging” methodologies, which were based on observing common behaviors among top-performing salespeople—instead of testing the actions of potential decision-makers.)

Over the last 18 months, marketing and sales messaging, content and skills training company Corporate Visions, has contracted three experiments with leading academic researchers to test the impact of supposed challenging or provocation-based messages in three specific selling scenarios:

  • New Sales Opportunities: Winning new business or stealing competitive business.
  • Renewal Sales Opportunities: Ensuring customer loyalty and capturing contract renewals
  • Price Increase Opportunities: Effectively passing along price increases to expand revenue while minimizing risk

In the first experiment, provocation-based messages introducing “unconsidered needs” or new insights proved to be the most successful in persuading potential customers to choose you over competitive alternatives that were responding to only “known needs.” The study showed that challenging your prospect in a “new sales” opportunity gives you a 10-plus percent lift in persuasion.

However, in the second and third experiments, which focused on existing customers, this approach became the biggest loser. Turns out, when you are trying to renew a customer, or pass along a price increase, introducing a challenging message with “unconsidered needs” will put you at significant risk of losing them.

The most recent experiment, focused on communicating price increases, showed that the provocative approach created these results for the “challenging message”:

  • 18.8% less favorable attitudes
  • 15.5% less likely to renew
  • 16.3 % more likely to switch

The actual winning approach focused more on reinforcing your customer’s status quo bias instead of disrupting it.

“The picture is compelling,” said professor Nick Lee of Warwick Business School in England, who conducted this most recent experiment, in a news release. “If you introduce an unconsidered need, you start making your customer think more carefully about what they want and how to get it. So, they become more likely to consider others.

“It was amazing to me, how the pattern was so clear. It is rare to see such strong and consistent results across so many different groups in this kind of experiment,” Lee added. “It’s also quite counter-intuitive these days with all the hype around provocation-based selling, that the ‘unconsidered needs’ approach turns out to be such a poor idea, according to our data.”

“It’s clearly not a one-size-fits-all approach when it comes to communicating with customers,” said Tim Riesterer, chief strategy and research officer for Corporate Visions, in the release. “Challenging a customer when you are trying to defeat the status quo works. But, challenging a customer when you are trying to keep them and get them to pay more doesn’t.”

Based on the experiments, which also revealed the best approaches for customer messaging success, Corporate Visions has developed situational frameworks for helping companies create and deliver messages for each of the key selling moments:

  • Why Change? Telling a story that defeats status quo bias and gets prospects to agree to change
  • Why You? Telling a follow-on story that clearly differentiates you from the competing alternatives
  • Why Stay? Telling a story that convinces existing customers to renew their relationship with you
  • Why Pay? Telling your customers a story that is most likely to generate a positive response to a price increase

More details on the experiments entitled “Why Stay?” and “Why Pay” can be found in the Corporate Visions resource library, where you will find the research briefs, infographics, video links and other content describing the results.

Daily PR Updates

Essential PR industry news, opinion, and analysis delivered to your inbox daily.

Bulldog Reporter
Bulldog Reporter is a leader in media intelligence supplying news, analysis and high-level training content to public relations and corporate communications professionals with the mission of helping these practitioners achieve superior competitive performance.

RECENT ARTICLES

How HR employee management software can improve your PR results

How HR employee management software can improve your PR results

The human resources and public relations departments are different sides of the same coin, but it’s rare that companies give them the space to work together. Without a quality work culture, employees will leave, talent will stay away, and your reputation will take a...

5 tips for PR to better incorporate technology

5 tips for PR to better incorporate technology

Technology has drastically changed the public relations field over the last several years. The rise of social media has given PR professionals new tools to reach and engage with their audiences. At the same time, new technologies have made it easier for journalists...