The media is an important factor in the lives of most people. In fact, recent studies indicate that Americans spend an average of 10 hours a day consuming media—whether it’s on the television, a smartphone or a computer screen. The question is, in a world where people have so much access to information and media coverage, how is the legal system affected?
Ultimately, as more people read about companies and accusations online, or follow along in PR campaigns they may be less able to perform their duties as a judge or jury with an entirely objective opinion. After all, the way that we see companies in the media can change how we feel about them overall.
Representing the legal system in media
One of the initial ways that the media can affect jurors and judges is in the way that the legal system appears on movies, television shows and in other channels too. Countless people spend their days streaming or binge-watching stories about legal systems online, and the information that they see in these shows can change the way that people perceive legal experts.
For instance, if someone watches a show in which a legal psychologist is often portrayed as unreliable or trustworthy, then the next time they act as a juror, that person may address psychologists with unconscious bias. Often, people don’t even realize that they’re looking at people with prejudice until they give reasons for their decisions at a later stage.
Learning about the clients in the case
Another way that media coverage changes the way that judges and juries act in the legal system, is by giving them extra information into the case, or the clients behind the case. For instance, in today’s highly-connected social world, the details of a scandal are often posted on social media accounts almost instantly. This often happens even before the company has a chance to make a formal statement.
The fast-paced nature of the media coverage world means that people begin to form opinions faster today than they have in the past. What’s more, a company’s carefully formed PR strategy could help judges and jurors to feel a certain way about a business or individual before they’ve heard the details of the case. This means that from the moment a juror enters the courtroom, they’re already biased in the way they make decisions regarding the case.
Media always affects people
Though the legal system is working to reduce the amount of exposure that juries and judges get to PR campaigns during a case, the truth is that human beings will always feel influence from what they see in the media. This truth is what makes PR campaigns so effective in the first place. Some people are even affected by their exposure to previous cases. For instance, studies have found that learning about similar cases can sway the way a person decides about future issues.
Whether it’s social media coverage or crisis PR, media is constantly changing the way that we think and respond to other people.
Get Your Daily PR Updates
Subscribe to get daily PR News updates from Bulldog Reporter
The workplace is evolving at lightning speed, due to the impact of several factors, including a rapidly and continuously shifting technological landscape and the growth of globalization. Meanwhile, an aging Baby Boomer workforce means that by 2020, one out of four...
Here you have it! The most notable journalist and media industry moves of the past week. USA AND CANADA Follow us on Twitter @Press_Moves News and Media Axios: Margaret Harding McGill (@margarethmcgill) has joined as Technology Policy Reporter. Colorado Sun, The:...
Looking for a crisis agency? Then you’ve probably seen some pretty compelling case studies—big name brands, major wins and encouraging outcomes. All bright, shiny and safe. But, please know, it’s all baloney. Case studies are a legitimate marketing tool for...