The media is an important factor in the lives of most people. In fact, recent studies indicate that Americans spend an average of 10 hours a day consuming media—whether it’s on the television, a smartphone or a computer screen. The question is, in a world where people have so much access to information and media coverage, how is the legal system affected?
Ultimately, as more people read about companies and accusations online, or follow along in PR campaigns they may be less able to perform their duties as a judge or jury with an entirely objective opinion. After all, the way that we see companies in the media can change how we feel about them overall.
Representing the legal system in media
One of the initial ways that the media can affect jurors and judges is in the way that the legal system appears on movies, television shows and in other channels too. Countless people spend their days streaming or binge-watching stories about legal systems online, and the information that they see in these shows can change the way that people perceive legal experts.
For instance, if someone watches a show in which a legal psychologist is often portrayed as unreliable or trustworthy, then the next time they act as a juror, that person may address psychologists with unconscious bias. Often, people don’t even realize that they’re looking at people with prejudice until they give reasons for their decisions at a later stage.
Learning about the clients in the case
Another way that media coverage changes the way that judges and juries act in the legal system, is by giving them extra information into the case, or the clients behind the case. For instance, in today’s highly-connected social world, the details of a scandal are often posted on social media accounts almost instantly. This often happens even before the company has a chance to make a formal statement.
The fast-paced nature of the media coverage world means that people begin to form opinions faster today than they have in the past. What’s more, a company’s carefully formed PR strategy could help judges and jurors to feel a certain way about a business or individual before they’ve heard the details of the case. This means that from the moment a juror enters the courtroom, they’re already biased in the way they make decisions regarding the case.
Media always affects people
Though the legal system is working to reduce the amount of exposure that juries and judges get to PR campaigns during a case, the truth is that human beings will always feel influence from what they see in the media. This truth is what makes PR campaigns so effective in the first place. Some people are even affected by their exposure to previous cases. For instance, studies have found that learning about similar cases can sway the way a person decides about future issues.
Whether it’s social media coverage or crisis PR, media is constantly changing the way that we think and respond to other people.
Get Your Daily PR Updates
Subscribe to get daily PR News updates from Bulldog Reporter
With another holiday season in full throttle, it was no surprise that one of our holiday kick-off posts logged the most clicks in November—but a little surprising that none of the rest of the month’s top articles were holiday-related. Oh well, our most trafficked...
According to recent reports, the field of influencer marketing is predicted to quickly become an industry that’s worth $6.5 billion, with over a thousand different influencer marketing agencies in the world. And the number of agencies just keeps growing—which means...
New research from digital marketing agency IronMonk examines whether or not consumers will buy from a company with a poorly designed website—and discovering that a whopping 86 percent of Americans say they won’t buy from such a company. More specifically, the survey...