Should brands take a public stand on politics? New research reveals a new outlook.

by | Nov 6, 2018 | Analysis, Public Relations

It’s harder to hide from non-stop political noise these days as the United States has never been more divided. Various factions seem engaged in a contest to outmaneuver each other to be more polarizing.

There’s an old saying that business and politics don’t mix.  However, in this environment, businesses are increasingly finding themselves wrestling with that question: Should brands take a public stand on political issues?

To be clear, we are not talking about Patagonia supporting the environment or Google opposing the repeal of Net Neutrality. In cases like those, there’s a very clear impact on business and you could credibly argue businesses are obligated in those cases to enter the fray. The question this survey gets after is far more visceral.


As it is with politics, there’s no shortage of opinions on the topic. Aside from a few high-profile anecdotes, I haven’t seen very much in the way of research on the topic, particularly with a line of questioning that brings back the original reasons for making a purchase, like quality, convenience and price. And that’s the purpose of this survey — to bring another level of objectivity to this business decision about politics.

The key findings follow below.  Click on the images of higher resolution or download the study from SlideShare below.

1) Most respondents say brands should stay clear of politics.

Nearly half (49%) of overall respondents said brands should not weigh in on political issues. However, it’s not a majority because about one-third said they believe brands should get involved, while another 22% were unsure. Sentiment analysis around this question suggests context matters.

s-Younger respondents more likely to mix business and politics

2) Younger respondents more likely to mix business and politics.

A cross-tab analysis by age shows a compelling correlation between age and the viewpoint on this question. Younger people, ages 18-29, were more likely to say brands should take political sides publicly (56%). The older the respondent, the more likely they were to stay brands should abstain from politics.

s-To agree or disagree is a critical question

3) To agree or disagree is a critical question.

If a brand takes a public political position that respondents agreed with, about half (48%) were more likely to make a purchase while the other half (47%) were indifferent. However, the numbers swing the other way if the brand takes a position with which they disagree – 53% were less likely to make a purchase and 40% were indifferent.

4) Women are more likely to act than men.

A cross-tab analysis of this question by gender shows respondents that identified as women were 16% more likely than men to take action against a brand that takes a political position with which they disagree.  This shows while men are more likely to say brands shouldn’t get involved in politics, they are also less likely to act if a brand does pick a political side.

s-Quality convenience and price have a mitigating effect

5) Quality, convenience, and price have a mitigating effect.

If the quality, convenience or price of a product or service was better than the competition, respondents began to tip back and said they would still buy from a brand even if they took a political position with which they disagree.

What Should Brands Do?

The survey data suggests to me that a brand could potentially take sides, and not only survive but thrive. Still, it’s a risky proposition that would require extensive resources to successfully navigate.

If brands are truly intent on being good corporate citizens, I believe a better path is to strive to unite people – be it the next Ice Bucket Challenge or $5 million Super Bowl spot. We don’t need more voices or money with a political bent aimed as stoking up discontent with the other side. No one wants their choice of paper products in at the store to emerge as a political statement. We need civility, understanding and a reminder that we can have a difference of opinion and still be good neighbors.

It’s a hard problem to solve. The eggshells we walk on today are so delicate, even the high road brings risk. Then again businesses are born to solve problems.

This survey was conducted using a commercially available online research panel from October 19, 2018, to October 20, 2018. The poll queried U.S. respondents ages 18-79 about their views about the public endorsement of political views by commercial businesses. A total of 263 respondents completed the survey and has a margin of error at (+/-) 6%. The percentages on individual questions may not add up perfectly to 100% where rounding is applied.

This article originally appeared on the Sword and the Script blog; reprinted with permission.

Daily PR Updates

Subscribe to get daily PR News updates from Bulldog Reporter

Frank Strong

Frank Strong is the founder and president of Sword and the Script Media, LLC, a veteran-owned business focused on PR, content marketing and social media for the B2B market space.


PR careers: 6 lessons I’ve learned as a junior copywriter

PR careers: 6 lessons I’ve learned as a junior copywriter

I have worked as a junior copywriter for a little over three months now, and in that time, I have learned a vast amount. I work at TopLine Comms, a B2B digital PR and SEO agency with a variety of technology and engineering clients, and my day to day work involves...

Why Chief People Officers see a steep climb to the future

Why Chief People Officers see a steep climb to the future

Most chief people officers (CPOs) realize they need new skills to meet the demand of the 21st century role, but few are prepared, citing a lack of development and investment from the C-suite. This is according to a new study by SHRM’s HR business and thought leaders...