The level of distrust in the media levied by the current administration is clearly filtering to the consumer level—but it is also impacting media buying and content placement goals throughout government. According to new research from business intelligence and research firm Market Connections, how much confidence federal government decision-makers and influencers have in the news reported among different media sources could impact how they view advertising and earned media in those sources.
The org’s new 2018 Federal Media and Marketing Study (FMMS) confirms that federal workers are wary of the news reported in some of the more mainstream, national media sources. Conversely, eight out of ten show a fair amount or great deal of confidence in federal and congressional sources Defense News, Government Executive, Federal Times, Army Times and Navy Times.
“While federal marketers need to be cognizant of co-mingling their brand with specific media sources, it’s important to balance the confidence level with audience reach,” said Aaron Heffron, president of Market Connections, in a news release. “Federally focused media outlets continue to be a trusted source of news and information, albeit with some limitations based on their reach and market focus. With all the noise about ‘fake news’ in this highly politicized environment, federal contractors may want to consider the halo effect of the earned and paid media placed with different sources.”
“However, in addition to audience reach and confidence level, federal marketers need to pay attention to their target audiences,” said study cofounder Sara Leiman, VP and media director of TMP Government, in the release. “Confidence levels vary by agency type, location, product category or political party affiliation. While overall numbers may be helpful, it’s important for marketers to look deeper, especially if they are focusing on agency-based marketing.”
Other highlights from the study include:
- Nearly two-thirds of respondents feel that national media’s coverage will be somewhat to a lot more biased in the future;
- Recommendations from peers and colleagues continues to be the top trusted source of information according to half of respondents, with an uptick for all sources aligned with professional associations including websites, white papers, case studies and webinars in 2018 from 2017;
- Across the board, social media usage has increased among federal decision makers, the largest percentage increase being Instagram up from 26 percent in 2017 to 40 percent in 2018, followed by Twitter with 39 percent in 2018 up from 30 percent in 2017.
The survey represents the views of nearly 3,000 federal workers in a variety of positions. Market Connections aggregates the data and makes it available to federal marketers online. Clients use the data to assess changes in media consumption and identify preferences for print, television, radio, mobile, social media and Internet-based news media. Demographic, job function, and purchasing data allows for tactical media targeting and placements.
Want more like this?
Subscribe to get daily or weekly PR News updates from Bulldog Reporter
More than 6 in 10 (61 percent) Americans are concerned about the products they put in, on and around their bodies—but a third (34 percent) say they rarely or never research product claims, new research from public health and safety org NSF International reveals. All...
In a world where positive reviews hold more value than paid ads and, thus, bring in more revenue, it's only logical that businesses would be going the extra mile in an attempt to encourage people to leave a positive review. How would you react if we were to tell you...
Most of us have heard the famous phrase, “It takes many good deeds to build a good reputation, and only one bad one to lose it.” Unfortunately, these days, you don't have complete control over your own reputation. There was a time when, as long as your company didn't...